Premium
Did Paul Kammerer discover epigenetic inheritance? No and why not
Author(s) -
Gliboff Sander
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of experimental zoology part b: molecular and developmental evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1552-5015
pISSN - 1552-5007
DOI - 10.1002/jez.b.21374
Subject(s) - scrutiny , inheritance (genetic algorithm) , reading (process) , genealogy , epigenetics , history , biology , epistemology , evolutionary biology , genetics , philosophy , linguistics , law , political science , gene
In a recent article in this journal, Alexander Vargas presents a new, epigenetic explanation of Paul Kammerer's controversial midwife toad experiments, but he has constructed his model without first reading Kammerer's original articles. A look at the articles shows that Vargas is seriously misinformed about what Kammerer did and what the results even were. His model simply cannot explain the results as they were originally reported and it cannot easily be corrected. Similarly, Vargas' historical inferences about the Kammerer affair, Kammerer's priority for the discovery of parent‐of‐origin effects, and the negative reactions of geneticists to this purported discovery, are unsupported and do not stand up to scrutiny. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 314B:616–624, 2010 . © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.