Premium
Unresolved boundaries of evolutionary theory and the question of how inheritance systems evolve: 75 years of debate on the evolution of dominance
Author(s) -
Bagheri Homayoun C.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of experimental zoology part b: molecular and developmental evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1552-5015
pISSN - 1552-5007
DOI - 10.1002/jez.b.21069
Subject(s) - dominance (genetics) , population , evolutionary biology , inheritance (genetic algorithm) , natural selection , evolutionary theory , selection (genetic algorithm) , modern evolutionary synthesis , biology , epistemology , positive economics , genetics , sociology , philosophy , computer science , demography , artificial intelligence , economics , gene
One of the key issues in the evolution of life is the evolution of inheritance systems. In population genetics, the earliest attempt at addressing the latter problem revolved around Fisher's theory on the evolution of dominance. Fisher's hypothesis was that inheritance systems could be modified during the evolutionary process in such a way that wild‐type phenotypes could become dominant with respect to mutant phenotypes. This would result in the buffering of a population against the deleterious effects of mutations. The debate that ensued on this topic has been one of the most longstanding in evolutionary theory. At present, the prevalent view is that dominance cannot evolve as a direct result of selection. Furthermore, it has been argued that due to inherent constraints in biochemical systems, the manifestation of dominance is a default expectation and hence evolutionary explanations are not necessary. This has led to the position that the subject is generally resolved and no further debate is necessary. However, there are also several studies indicating that dominance levels can be modified as a result of changes in the genetic background. Furthermore, other studies have indicated that dominance selection is possible in certain circumstances. To a large degree, conclusions from both of the latter types of studies have been ignored. In this article, the history of several intellectual and methodological traditions that have contributed to this debate are traced, including experimental genetics, theoretical population genetics and theoretical biochemistry. In the light of both old and contemporary works on this topic, it is argued that contrary to the prevalent view, the evolution of dominance is not a resolved issue. A re‐examination of this issue is essential, given that dominance evolution is likely to be an important stepping stone towards understanding the evolution of inheritance systems. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 306B, 2006 . © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.