Premium
Modularity and integration in the hominoid scapula
Author(s) -
Young Nathan
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of experimental zoology part b: molecular and developmental evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1552-5015
pISSN - 1552-5007
DOI - 10.1002/jez.b.21003
Subject(s) - scapula , coracoid , biology , phylogenetic tree , similarity (geometry) , evolutionary biology , trait , phylogenetics , modularity (biology) , taxon , correlation , mathematics , paleontology , artificial intelligence , computer science , genetics , image (mathematics) , gene , programming language , geometry
In this paper, several hypotheses of morphological integration within the hominoid (ape) scapula are tested. In particular, whether the scapula represents a set of developmental tissues sharing tight correlations between constituent parts (i.e., highly integrated) or is more modularly organized (i.e., covariation is greater within regions than between) is tested. Whether the patterns of integration in the scapula have changed over phylogenetic time or in response to selective forces is also examined. Results from two different analyses (matrix correlations and edge deviance) indicate traits comprising the blade and acromion, and to a weaker degree the glenoid, correlate highly with each other. The coracoid exhibits more independence from other parts of the scapula, perhaps reflecting its distinct evolutionary developmental history. Overall, similarity in species‐specific patterns of correlation was high between all taxa. Correlation matrix similarity was significantly correlated with functional similarity and morphological distance, but not with phylogenetic distance. These results are congruent with other studies of integration that suggest correlation patterns remain stable over evolutionary time. There are changes associated with phylogeny, but the tight link between functional similarity and phylogenetic distance at this level of comparison presents possible challenges to interpretation. Overall similarities in the pattern of integration in all taxa might be better interpreted as relative strengthening or weakening of trait correlations rather than broadscale changes in the pattern of relationship between developmental regions. Larger sample sizes with greater taxonomic/functional breadth, and finer scale analyses of patterns of correlation are needed to test these hypotheses further. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 302B:226–240, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.