Premium
Global Research Alliance N 2 O chamber methodology guidelines: Statistical considerations, emission factor calculation, and data reporting
Author(s) -
Klein Cecile A. M.,
Alfaro Marta A.,
Giltrap Donna,
Topp Cairistiona F. E.,
Simon Priscila L.,
Noble Alasdair D. L.,
Weerden Tony J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.1002/jeq2.20127
Subject(s) - comparability , greenhouse gas , robustness (evolution) , data mining , computer science , statistical analysis , environmental science , statistics , mathematics , chemistry , ecology , biochemistry , combinatorics , biology , gene
Static chambers are often used for measuring nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes from soils, but statistical analysis of chamber data is challenged by the inherently heterogeneous nature of N 2 O fluxes. Because N 2 O chamber measurements are commonly used to assess N 2 O mitigation strategies or to determine country‐specific emission factors (EFs) for calculating national greenhouse gas inventories, it is important that statistical analysis of the data is sound and that EFs are robustly estimated. This paper is one of a series of articles that provide guidance on different aspects of N 2 O chamber methodologies. Here, we discuss the challenges associated with statistical analysis of heterogeneous data, by summarizing statistical approaches used in recent publications and providing guidance on assessing normality and options for transforming data that follow a non‐normal distribution. We also recommend minimum requirements for reporting of experimental and metadata of N 2 O studies to ensure that the robustness of the results can be reliably evaluated. This includes detailed information on the experimental site, methodology and measurement procedures, gas analysis, data and statistical analyses, and approaches to generate EFs, as well as results of ancillary measurements. The reliability, robustness, and comparability of soil N 2 O emissions data will be improved through (a) application, and reporting, of more rigorous methodological standards by researchers and (b) greater vigilance by reviewers and scientific editors to ensure that all necessary information is reported in scientific publications.