Premium
Chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves of Urtica dioica L. analyzed after high‐pressure freezing and freeze‐substitution and compared with conventional fixation followed by room temperature dehydration
Author(s) -
Pfeiffer Stephan,
Krupinska Karin
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
microscopy research and technique
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.536
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1097-0029
pISSN - 1059-910X
DOI - 10.1002/jemt.20254
Subject(s) - ultrastructure , dehydration , fixation (population genetics) , chloroplast , botany , biophysics , biology , chemistry , horticulture , biochemistry , gene
In this article, we report on the adaptation of high‐pressure freezing and freeze‐substitution (HPF‐FS) for ultrastructural analysis of leaf tissue with special emphasis on chloroplasts. To replace the gas in the intercellular spaces, a mixture of water and methanol (MeOH) was employed. We compared three different supplements for FS—osmiumtetroxide, uranyl acetate, and safranin—with regard to the preservation of the ultrastructure of chloroplasts and other cellular compartments. The results show that (i) replacement of air within intercellular spaces by 8% (v/v) MeOH has no influence on the ultrastructure of the chloroplasts, (ii) undulation of membranes frequently observed after conventional preparation of specimens does not occur during chemical fixation but during room temperature dehydration, and (iii) uranyl acetate or osmium tetroxide employed during FS are not superior over safranin. Microsc. Res. Tech. 68:368–376, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.