z-logo
Premium
Low pressure mode combined with OsO 4 vapor fixation and sputter‐coating for the preservation of delicate aerial hyphae and conidia in the ESEM
Author(s) -
Coetzee Stephan H.,
Jordaan Anine,
Mpuchane Sisai F.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
microscopy research and technique
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.536
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1097-0029
pISSN - 1059-910X
DOI - 10.1002/jemt.20209
Subject(s) - environmental scanning electron microscope , hypha , coating , conidium , materials science , sputtering , scanning electron microscope , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , composite material , nanotechnology , chromatography , botany , thin film , biology
The newer generation of environmental scanning electron microscopes (ESEMs) allows samples to be viewed under a range of different vacuum conditions. No specific sample preparation protocols are required with the ESEMs, as fresh, unfixed samples are used and discarded later. We have worked out a method that preserves aerial hyphae on biltong that closely resemble fresh specimens and may be stored for viewing at a later date. Another advantage is that fixed samples are more resilient to the variable vacuum encountered in the ESEM. When biltong samples with fungal growth were first studied, we observed that vacuum‐related artifacts were induced unless vacuum conditions and changes in pressure were carefully controlled. Damage readily occured in conidia and its delicate hyphae. Fresh, unfixed samples are very vulnerable to these artifacts. In addition, biltong proved to be a problematic study sample because of its high salt content, its hygroscopic nature as well as being laden with spices. To eliminate these artifacts, the preservation of specimens by OsO 4 vapor fixation combined with a special sputter‐coating technique is described. Previous studies confirmed that OsO 4 vapor fixation is superior to traditional immersion fixation methods for the examination of hyphae and conidia of various fungi in a conventional SEM. However, both preparation methods induce sample shrinkage. We observed that OsO 4 vapor fixation followed by Au coating under strictly controlled vacuum conditions induced fewer artifacts and gave the best images with minimum distortion in low pressure (LP) mode. The proposed method allows samples to be viewed both in ESEM and LP mode. There are however some disadvantages inherent to ESEM mode. Even when viewing fixed, coated samples, care should be taken to maintain a pressure of not lower than 0.2 Torr in the specimen chamber. It is critical that different samples have the same vacuum exposure history, as shrinkage and collapse were found to be directly related to the lowest pressure the samples were subjected to, both in the sputter coater chamber and in the electron microscope specimen chamber. Microsc. Res. Tech. 67:265–270, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here