Premium
Predoctoral dental implant education techniques—students’ perception and attitude
Author(s) -
Chaturvedi Saurabh,
Elmahdi Asim Elsir,
Abdelmonem Adel M.,
Haralur Satheesh B.,
Alqahtani Nasser M.,
Suleman Ghazala,
Sharif Rania A.,
Gurumurthy Vishwanath,
Alfarsi Mohammed A
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1930-7837
pISSN - 0022-0337
DOI - 10.1002/jdd.12453
Subject(s) - bachelor , medical education , dental education , teaching method , medicine , syllabus , problem based learning , rehabilitation , dentistry , test (biology) , psychology , mathematics education , physical therapy , archaeology , history , paleontology , biology
Purpose Dental implant (DI) therapy is in high demand and can only be rendered efficiently to graduating dentists by effective teaching methodologies. This study aimed to assess the perceptions and attitudes of dental graduates towards predoctoral DI education techniques and rehabilitation by DI. Methods A total of 26 well‐structured questionnaires were distributed to 120 final‐year students. Modified advanced teaching methodologies such as e‐learning, small‐group teaching–problem‐based learning (SGT–PBL), and team‐based learning were implemented for teaching DI. Its effects were assessed using a questionnaire set: the first section (DI Rehabilitation) with 12 questions and the second (DI teaching methods) with 14 questions. Statistical analysis was done using the Chi‐square test, and a P ‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The response rate was 95.83%. Seventy‐five percent of the students recommended DI for patients, and 78% of them agreed to it themselves. On comparing teaching methods for DI, on and before level 12, small‐group teaching (PBL) was significantly at a higher proportion ( P = 0.002), followed by seminars ( P < 0.001). Students preferred small‐group teaching PBL (60%), followed by e‐learning (15%) and demonstration (10%). Ninety‐two percent of the students agreed that DI is an important subject in the “bachelor of dental surgery” (BDS) program, but 78% of them felt that time was insufficient to complete the DI syllabus. Conclusions The modified teaching methodologies used at level 12 for teaching DI enhanced students’ interest and knowledge. The SGT–PBL teaching method was the most preferred. It is recommended that dental implantology topics should be started early in the undergraduate curriculum, and the topics should be widely divided throughout BDS.