z-logo
Premium
Association between deficient cesarean delivery scar and cesarean scar syndrome
Author(s) -
Dosedla Erik,
Gál Peter,
Calda Pavel
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.272
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1097-0096
pISSN - 0091-2751
DOI - 10.1002/jcu.22911
Subject(s) - medicine , pelvic pain , adhesion , cesarean delivery , surgery , prospective cohort study , obstetrics , uterus , gynecology , pregnancy , chemistry , organic chemistry , biology , genetics
The aim of our study was to compare long‐term morbidity after elective and emergency cesarean delivery (CD). Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in 200 women delivered by CD. Ultrasound examinations were performed transvaginally at 6 weeks and 18 months after CD. Clinical data were collected at the time of CD and after 18 months. Results In the group of 200 women, 29% underwent emergency and 71% elective CD. Then, 6 weeks and 18 months after CD, a severe scar defect was present in 7% and 5%, respectively ( P = .4). After 18 months of CD, 17% (34/200) of women had evidence of adhesions of the vesicouterine pouch. Severe CD scar defects were significant predictors for adhesion formation in vesicouterine pouch (OR 3.14, 95% CI, 1.54‐4.74), pelvic pain (OR 1.68, 95% CI, 0.22‐3.14), dysmenorrhea (OR 2.12, 95% CI, 0.74‐3.50), and dyspareunia (OR 1.38, 95% CI, 0.09‐2.67). Uterine scar defects detected at 6 weeks after elective CD were detectable at 18 months in only 40% of cases, whereas uterine scar defects after emergency CD were still detectable in 87% of cases. Conclusion Uterine scar defects are more frequent at 18 weeks after emergency CD, than after elective CD (40% vs 87%). Women with severe scar defects have higher risk of adhesion formation, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here