Premium
The reliability of a breath‐hold protocol to determine cerebrovascular reactivity in adolescents
Author(s) -
Koep Jodie L.,
Barker Alan R.,
Banks Rhys,
Banger Rohit R.,
Sansum Kate M.,
Weston Max E.,
Bond Bert
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.272
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1097-0096
pISSN - 0091-2751
DOI - 10.1002/jcu.22891
Subject(s) - medicine , transcranial doppler , reliability (semiconductor) , coefficient of variation , middle cerebral artery , cardiology , ischemia , statistics , power (physics) , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics
Purpose Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is impaired in adolescents with cardiovascular disease risk factors. A breath‐hold test is a noninvasive method of assessing CVR, yet there are no reliability data of this outcome in youth. This study aimed to assess the reliability of a breath‐hold protocol to measure CVR in adolescents. Methods Twenty‐one 13 to 15 year old adolescents visited the laboratory on two separate occasions, to assess the within‐test, within‐day and between‐day reliability of a breath‐hold protocol, consisting of three breath‐hold attempts. CVR was defined as the relative increase from baseline in middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity following a maximal breath‐hold of up to 30 seconds, quantified via transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Results Mean breath‐hold duration and CVR were never significantly correlated ( r < .31, P > .08). The within‐test coefficient of variation for CVR was 15.2%, with no significant differences across breath‐holds ( P = .88), so the three breath‐hold attempts were averaged for subsequent analyses. The within‐ and between‐day coefficients of variation for CVR were 10.8% and 15.3%, respectively. Conclusions CVR assessed via a three breath‐hold protocol can be reliably measured in adolescents, yielding similar within‐ and between‐day reliability. Analyses revealed that breath‐hold length and CVR were unrelated, indicating the commonly reported normalization of CVR to breath‐hold duration (breath‐hold index) may be unnecessary in youth.