Premium
Lagrangian carotid strain imaging indices normalized to blood pressure for vulnerable plaque
Author(s) -
Varghese Tomy,
Meshram Nirvedh H.,
Mitchell Carol C.,
Wilbrand Stephanie M.,
Hermann Bruce P.,
Dempsey Robert J.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of clinical ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.272
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1097-0096
pISSN - 0091-2751
DOI - 10.1002/jcu.22739
Subject(s) - medicine , blood pressure , ultrasound , cardiology , normalization (sociology) , carotid endarterectomy , pulse pressure , mean arterial pressure , stenosis , nuclear medicine , radiology , heart rate , sociology , anthropology
Objective Ultrasound Lagrangian carotid strain imaging (LCSI) utilizes physiological deformation caused by arterial pressure variations to generate strain tensor maps of the vessel walls and plaques. LCSI has been criticized for the lack of normalization of magnitude‐based strain indices to physiological stimuli, namely blood pressure. We evaluated the impact of normalization of magnitude‐based strain indices to blood pressure measured immediately after the acquisition of radiofrequency (RF) data loops for LCSI. Materials and Methods A complete clinical ultrasound examination along with RF data loops for LCSI was performed on 50 patients (30 males and 20 females) who presented with >60% carotid stenosis and were scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Cognition was assessed using the 60‐minute neuropsychological test protocol. Results For axial strains correlation of maximum accumulated strain indices (MASI), cognition scores were −0.46 for non‐normalized and −0.45, −0.49, −0.37, and −0.48 for systolic, diastolic, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure normalized data, respectively. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values for classifiers designed using maximum likelihood estimation of a binormal distribution with a median‐split of the executive function cognition scores were 0.73, 0.70, 0.71, 0.70, and 0.71, respectively. Conclusions No significant differences in the AUC estimates were obtained between normalized and non‐normalized magnitude‐based strain indices.