z-logo
Premium
Shoulder sonography after intraarticular fluid injection for evaluation of anterior labral tears: Comparison with conventional sonography
Author(s) -
Jeong Woo Kyoung,
Ah Ryu Jeong,
Choi Seung Hong,
Choi Junho,
Ho Kim Seung,
Kim Jinoo,
Lee Seunghun
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of clinical ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.272
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1097-0096
pISSN - 0091-2751
DOI - 10.1002/jcu.21981
Subject(s) - medicine , tears , arthroscopy , receiver operating characteristic , ultrasound , radiology , nuclear medicine , kappa , surgery , linguistics , philosophy
Purpose. To compare shoulder sonography (US) after intraarticular fluid injection (“arthrosonography”) with conventional shoulder US for diagnosing anterior labral tears. Methods. Thirty consecutive patients who were to undergo shoulder MR arthrography were enrolled after written informed consent was obtained. A radiologist performed conventional US, using a 2‐ to 5‐MHz convex transducer on the subject whose arm was externally rotated, then abducted perpendicular to the trunk, and rotated internally and externally. After intraarticular injection of diluted gadolinium contrast for MR arthrography, arthrosonography was performed in the same manner as in the conventional method. Two other radiologists compared the two US methods in the diagnosis of anterior labral tears using a five‐point scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and weighted kappa values were calculated. Results. Fourteen patients proven to have anterior labral tears by arthroscopy constituted the disease group, and 16 patients, including the 4 patients who were negative on arthroscopy, constituted the normal group. The areas under the ROC curve of arthrosonography (mean, 0.977) were larger than those of conventional US (mean, 0.858). The kappa values for assessing the interobserver agreement of the two modalities were 0.40 and 0.82, respectively. Conclusions. Arthrosonography of the shoulder is more accurate and reliable than conventional US for diagnosing anterior labral tear. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 2013

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here