z-logo
Premium
Remote sonographic interpretation: Comparison of standardized video clips to still images
Author(s) -
Parsai Arman,
Zerizer Imene,
Hohmann Joachim,
Bongartz Georg,
Beglinger Christoph,
Sperandeo Giuseppe
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of clinical ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.272
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1097-0096
pISSN - 0091-2751
DOI - 10.1002/jcu.21974
Subject(s) - clips , medicine , ultrasound , radiology , teleradiology , ultrasonography , interpretation (philosophy) , surgery , computer science , telemedicine , economics , health care , programming language , economic growth
Objective. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of standardized video clips compared with still images in the diagnostic accuracy of remote sonographic interpretation.Methods. We compared the remote interpretation of sonographic examinations acquired with a standardized video clip approach to examinations performed with still images alone in 60 patients with various hepatic and extrahepatic pathologies.Results. The use of video clips improved the diagnostic accuracy of sonographic studies interpreted remotely compared with the use of still images ( p < 0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values increased from 47.3% to 68.3%, 81.8% to 87.8%, 71.5% to 81%, and 63.8% to 74.5%, respectively.Conclusions. Standardized video clips are easy to obtain, less operator‐dependent than still images, and can be transferred to remote sites without loss of important data. We recommend this method in remote interpretation (teleradiology and distant consultation) of sonographic examinations. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 40:495–501, 2012

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here