z-logo
Premium
Accuracy of blind versus ultrasound‐guided suprapatellar bursal injection
Author(s) -
Bum Park Yong,
Ah Choi Won,
Kim YongKyun,
Chul Lee Sang,
Hae Lee Ji
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of clinical ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.272
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1097-0096
pISSN - 0091-2751
DOI - 10.1002/jcu.20890
Subject(s) - medicine , effusion , ultrasound , knee joint , joint effusion , osteoarthritis , radiography , nuclear medicine , intra articular , surgery , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , pathology , alternative medicine
Purpose. To compare the accuracy rates between ultrasound (US)‐guided and blind knee intra‐articular injection via the suprapatellar bursa. Methods. Ninety‐nine patients with radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 2 or 3) without effusion were included. Fifty patients were assigned to the US‐guided injection group and 49 to the blind injection group. After a US‐guided or blind injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) and contrast dye through the suprapatellar bursa into the knee joint, a radiographic image was obtained in each case to ascertain whether all injected material had reached the intra‐articular space. Results. US‐guided HA injection exhibited a significantly greater accuracy (48 of 50 knees, 96.0%) than blind injection (41 of 49 knees, 83.7%). Conclusions. Intra‐articular injections through the suprapatellar bursa under US guidance increased the accuracy of knee joint injections. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound,2011

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom