Premium
Life cycle assessment of solar‐driven oxidation as a polishing step of secondary‐treated urban effluents
Author(s) -
IoannouTtofa Lida,
Foteinis Spyros,
Chatzisymeon Efthalia,
MichaelKordatou Irene,
FattaKassinos Despo
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of chemical technology and biotechnology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.64
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1097-4660
pISSN - 0268-2575
DOI - 10.1002/jctb.5126
Subject(s) - life cycle assessment , environmental science , renewable energy , sustainability , effluent , raw material , carbon footprint , environmental engineering , environmental impact assessment , ecological footprint , electricity , electricity generation , waste management , greenhouse gas , engineering , production (economics) , chemistry , ecology , power (physics) , physics , electrical engineering , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , biology , economics , macroeconomics
BACKGROUND In this work, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is utilized to estimate the environmental footprint of solar Fenton oxidation at pilot scale used as a polishing step of secondary‐treated urban effluents. All inputs (e.g. natural resources, raw materials, etc.) and outputs (e.g. emissions, etc.) of the process were quantitatively defined and/or estimated. The system under study includes raw materials, energy, land use, chemicals, local transportation needs, and air‐/waterborne emissions. RESULTS The main environmental hotspots of this system were identified (i.e. energy consumption and use of chemicals). The environmental sustainability of this technology was found to be high, since its environmental footprint for the treatment of 1 m 3 of wastewater was found to be only 8.7 kg CO 2 m −3 , which is approx. 1.6% of the total CO 2 emissions of the treatment of the daily effluents of a Cypriot resident. Nevertheless, alternative scenarios were investigated, in order to further enhance its overall environmental performance. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the majority of the environmental impacts of this process could be attributed to indirect emissions, tracing back to electricity generation, followed by emissions from the chemicals used. The most critical improvement identified herein, is the use of a renewable energy source. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry