Premium
Comparable evaluation of various commercially available aluminium‐based coagulants for the treatment of surface water and for the post‐treatment of urban wastewater
Author(s) -
Zouboulis Anastasios I,
Traskas Georgios
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of chemical technology and biotechnology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.64
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1097-4660
pISSN - 0268-2575
DOI - 10.1002/jctb.1300
Subject(s) - flocculation , alum , wastewater , aluminium , aluminium sulfate , chemistry , sewage treatment , water treatment , surface water , pulp and paper industry , suspended solids , coagulation , environmental engineering , environmental science , organic chemistry , engineering , psychology , psychiatry
In this study the efficiency of various commercially‐available coagulants, ie alum and poly‐aluminium chlorides (PACls), for the treatment of surface (river) water, or for the post‐treatment of biologically pretreated urban wastewater were investigated. The different coagulants were comparatively evaluated, considering the removal of suspended solids (SS), natural organic matter (NOM), as well as the residual aluminium concentration, and the removal of phosphates (inorganic phosphorus), in the case of urban wastewater treatment. The dynamics of flocculation were also studied using a Photometric Dispersion Analyser (PDA) in order to compare the flocculation rates and the strength of different coagulant flocs. Finally, the optimum operational conditions, ie coagulant dosage, pH, temperature, duration and intensity of (initial) rapid‐mixing rate, were determined for the examined cases. It can be generally supported that PACl coagulants were superior to alum, as they presented higher SS and NOM removal, stronger and larger flocs, higher flocculation rates and lower residual aluminium concentration, which is a very important factor, especially for the treatment of surface water destinated for potable use. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry