z-logo
Premium
Randomized, Double‐Blind, Crossover, Clinical‐End‐Point Pilot Study to Examine the Use of Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a Bioassay for Dose Separation of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate
Author(s) -
Weiler John M.,
Sorkness Christine A.,
Hendeles Leslie,
Nichols Sara,
Zhu Yaping
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.92
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1552-4604
pISSN - 0091-2700
DOI - 10.1002/jcph.1043
Subject(s) - fluticasone propionate , medicine , exhaled nitric oxide , crossover study , salmeterol , inhalation , expiration , asthma , fluticasone , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , exhalation , repeated measures design , zoology , respiratory system , placebo , mathematics , statistics , alternative medicine , pathology , biology , bronchoconstriction
This was a randomized, double‐blind, crossover, clinical‐end‐point pilot study examining the hypothesis that inhaled fluticasone propionate decreases exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) concentrations within a week of beginning treatment and shows evidence of dose separation across the marketed dose range. Subjects had a ≥6‐month history of asthma and screening eNO ≥60 parts per billion. At the start of each treatment period, eNO was ≥55 parts per billion, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second was ≥50% predicted. Subjects attended a clinic visit daily on consecutive mornings during each of 3 1‐week treatment periods to measure eNO and receive once‐daily doses of 100/50, 250/50, or 500/50 fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination product (Advair ® Diskus). Daily eNO value recorded was the highest of 3 measurements; 1 inhalation of treatment was then administered. Procedures were repeated for 3 treatment cycles, separated by 14‐day minimum washouts. A total of 105 subjects were screened; 22 were randomized; and 17 completed all treatments. Mean percentage eNO decrease (standard deviation) from day 1 baseline for each treatment period was 36.6 (±18.7), 45.3 (±16.5), and 54.6 (±12.5) with Advair ® 100/50, 250/50, and 500/50, respectively. Mean percentage decrease in eNO across each treatment (dose) was modeled using a mixed‐model ANOVA. Although the overall treatment was significant ( P = .0015), because of the relatively small sample size and within‐subject variability, only the 100/50 vs 500/50 ( P = .0003) and 250/50 vs 500/50 ( P = .047) treatments were significantly different.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom