Premium
DNA polymerase‐primase complex in wild‐type and ts A1S9 mouse L‐cells, temperature‐sensitive for dna replication during cell cycle progression
Author(s) -
Munsch Nicole,
Sheinin Rose
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of cellular physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.529
H-Index - 174
eISSN - 1097-4652
pISSN - 0021-9541
DOI - 10.1002/jcp.1041440322
Subject(s) - primase , dna polymerase , microbiology and biotechnology , dna polymerase ii , dna replication , biology , polymerase , dna clamp , dna synthesis , dna , dna polymerase i , cell cycle , biochemistry , cell , reverse transcriptase , polymerase chain reaction , gene
Abstract Ts A1S9 mutant cells, derived from wild type WT‐4 mouse L‐cells, are temperature‐sensitive (ts) for DNA synthesis and cell division. We try to determine the cause of the arrest of DNA replication in ts A1S9 cells at the nonpermissive temperature by comparing the modifications induced by the shift of temperature on the activity and the synthesis of DNA polymerase‐alpha and DNA primase as a function of time. Forty‐seven hours after temperature upshift DNA polymerase‐alpha activity of ts A1S9 cells was inhibited by 90% while primase activity was barely detectable. By contrast, the activities of both enzymes increased to a plateau level in WT‐4 cultured at either temperature and in ts A1S9 cells grown at the low permissive temperature. Study of the synthesis of DNA polymerase‐alpha primase and of the structure of the enzyme complex during cell cycle progression was approached by immunoprecipitation of [ 35 S]‐labelled cells, with a specific monoclonal antibody directed against DNA polymerase‐alpha. We have found that, irrespective of temperature of cultivation of WT‐4 or ts A1S9 cells, this antibody precipited polypeptides of 220, 186, 150, 110, 68–70, 60, and 48 kDa from cell extracts. With ts A1S9 cells cultivated at 38.5°C for 48 hr the polypeptides of 220 and 186 kDa, associated with alpha‐polymerase activity, were considerably more abundant than in the control cells, with a concomitant decline in the polypeptides of 60 and 48 kDa, implicated in primase activity. Thus the inhibition of DNA polymerase‐alpha cannot be due to a decreased synthesis of the 186 kDa subunit but to its temperature inactivation. Consistent with a recent asymmetric dimeric model where polymerase‐alpha complex and polymerase delta complex synthesize co‐ordinately at the replication fork lagging and leading DNA strands, the observed alterations of polymerase‐alpha and primase content explain the inhibition of DNA synthesis and the cell cycle arrest of the ts A1S9 cells at the nonpermissive temperature.