Premium
The comparability of the visual and verbal versions of the Inclusion of Community in Self scale
Author(s) -
Folk Johanna B.,
Enriquez Kaitlinn,
Cebas Luis,
Stuewig Jeffrey,
Tangney June P.,
Mashek Debra
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of community psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.585
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1520-6629
pISSN - 0090-4392
DOI - 10.1002/jcop.22196
Subject(s) - comparability , psychology , social connectedness , discriminant validity , scale (ratio) , measure (data warehouse) , inclusion (mineral) , affect (linguistics) , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , cognitive psychology , social psychology , psychometrics , computer science , communication , internal consistency , mathematics , data mining , physics , combinatorics , quantum mechanics
Aims Many factors affect the utility and practicality of measures in longitudinal studies characterized by transient participants such as those caught in the cycle of incarceration. The current study evaluated the psychometric equivalency of a visual and a verbal version of a single‐item connectedness measure; the aim was to determine whether the different formats can be used interchangeably depending on feasibility. Methods Participants were 133 jail inmates (49% male; 43% Black; M age = 35 years, SD = 10 years) interviewed just before release from jail. Results Results provide evidence for the concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validity of the two ICS versions. Attempts to calibrate the verbal measure to the visual measure were moderately successful. Conclusion Taken together, results suggest the two formats are comparable, but not interchangeable; they map on to other variables in similar ways but cannot be used in lieu of one another.