Premium
Narrating ambiguous loss: Deficiencies in narrative processing and negative appraisal of consequences
Author(s) -
Huang Manxia,
Habermas Tilmann
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of clinical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1097-4679
pISSN - 0021-9762
DOI - 10.1002/jclp.23146
Subject(s) - psychology , distancing , grief , narrative , coping (psychology) , ambiguity , weight loss , meaning (existential) , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , psychological intervention , psychotherapist , disease , psychiatry , medicine , covid-19 , linguistics , philosophy , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , obesity
Objective To compare narrative coping with physical and psychological ambiguous loss (AL) and definite loss in terms of distancing (vs. narrative immersion), meaning‐making, and subjective biographical consequences. Methods Thirty adults who had lost a parent to death, to going missing, or to Alzheimer disease ( N = 90, 67 females; mean age 36.73 years, SD = 7.27; mean time since loss 9.0 years) narrated two loss‐related and three control memories. Results Individuals with AL were not more immersed in the loss experience, but less successful in finding meaning and in evaluating the loss and its consequences positively compared to those with a definite loss. These group differences were not due to differences in depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and protracted grief. Conclusions Ambiguity of loss renders meaning‐making and coherently narrating loss more difficult, leading to more negative affect, suggesting interventions that help narrating loss coherently in a self‐accepting way.