Premium
A comparison of client preferences for intervention empirical support versus common therapy variables
Author(s) -
Swift Joshua K.,
Callahan Jennifer L.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of clinical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1097-4679
pISSN - 0021-9762
DOI - 10.1002/jclp.20720
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , psychology , intervention (counseling) , empirical research , preference , clinical psychology , psychotherapist , applied psychology , psychiatry , philosophy , epistemology , economics , microeconomics
Client preferences have been identified as an essential part of evidence‐based practice in psychology. Further, client preferences have been found to play an important role in determining premature termination and therapy outcomes. However, our current understanding of this client variable is limited because of the methodologies that have previously been used to assess these preferences. In this study, 57 adult clients from a university‐based psychology department clinic completed an instrument weighing preferences for intervention specific empirical support against preferences for 4 other common factor variables. These clients were found to discount a significant amount of intervention empirical support to ensure the following: (a) a satisfactory therapeutic relationship could be developed, (b) their therapist would be empathetic and accepting, (c) their therapist would have a greater level of experience, and (d) they, as clients, would do more of the talking during sessions. These findings suggest that clients prefer treatment decisions to be based on variables other than intervention empirical support alone. Recommendations are made for assessing and including client preferences to provide more individually tailored interventions. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 66:1–15, 2010.