Can a matrix make a training model?: “No.” let's not throw out the Boulder model | Zendy

Meichenbaum Donald | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

Can a matrix make a training model?: “No.” let's not throw out the Boulder model

Author(s) -

Meichenbaum Donald

Publication year - 2005

Publication title -

journal of clinical psychology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124

H-Index - 119

eISSN - 1097-4679

pISSN - 0021-9762

DOI - 10.1002/jclp.20155

Subject(s) - psychology , matrix model , training (meteorology) , graduate students , trace (psycholinguistics) , medical education , field (mathematics) , mental health , matrix (chemical analysis) , applied psychology , mental model , psychotherapist , cognitive science , pedagogy , medicine , mathematics , philosophy , pure mathematics , linguistics , physics , meteorology , mathematical physics , string (physics) , materials science , composite material

In response to the call by C.R. Snyder and T.R. Elliott (this issue) for a new clinical training program, I propose the need to keep the Boulder model. I trace my involvement with the Boulder model from my clinical graduate training through my 30 years as a professor. One of the major tasks of clinical training is to teach graduate students to think in a critical rigorous fashion in order to avoid the fads in the mental health field. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research