
Diagnostic and prognostic value of circRNAs expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Feng Huajun,
Wang Dingting,
Liu Jinping,
Zou Longfei,
Xu Shengen,
Liang Zhuoping,
Qin Gang
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of clinical laboratory analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.536
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1098-2825
pISSN - 0887-8013
DOI - 10.1002/jcla.24496
Subject(s) - meta analysis , medicine , cochrane library , head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , stage (stratigraphy) , circular rna , oncology , receiver operating characteristic , lymph node , head and neck , lymph node metastasis , metastasis , downregulation and upregulation , basal cell , pathology , cancer research , head and neck cancer , radiation therapy , biology , cancer , surgery , paleontology , biochemistry , gene
Background Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been found to have potential biological applications against tumors in humans. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and clinicopathological value of circRNAs in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods The PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for the relevant studies before October 20, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed based on STATA 15.0, Meta‐DiSc 1.4, and RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 55 reports regarding 56 kinds of circRNA were studied in this meta‐analysis, including 23, 38, and 26 articles on diagnosis, prognosis, and clinicopathological features, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver‐operating characteristic curve (SROC) were 0.78, 0.84, and 0.87, respectively. Besides, the upregulation of oncogenic circRNAs was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR=2.25, p < 0.05) and disease‐free interval (DFS) (HR=1.92, p < 0.05). In contrast, the elevated expression of tumor suppressor circRNAs was associated with a favorable prognosis (HR=0.50, p < 0.05). In addition, the high expression of oncogenic circRNAs was associated with the tumor size (OR=3.59, p < 0.05), degree of differentiation (OR=1.89, p < 0.05), TNM stage (OR=2.35, p < 0.05), lymph node metastasis (OR=1.85, p < 0.05), and distant metastasis (OR=3.42, p < 0.05). Moreover, the expression of tumor suppressor circRNAs was associated with improved clinicopathological features (lymph node metastasis: OR=0.25, p < 0.05). Conclusions CircRNAs could serve as potential predictive indicators and be useful for the diagnosis, prognosis, and identification of clinicopathological features in HNSCC.