Open AccessPeripheral blood cell count ratios are predictive biomarkers of clinical response and prognosis for non‐surgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy
Author(s) -
Zhi Xiaohui,
Jiang Kan,
Shen Yue,
Su Xinyu,
Wang Ke,
Ma Yuanyuan,
Zhou Liqing
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical laboratory analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.536
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1098-2825
pISSN - 0887-8013
DOI - 10.1002/jcla.23468
Subject(s) - medicine , multivariate analysis , logistic regression , stage (stratigraphy) , radiation therapy , gastroenterology , univariate analysis , oncology , lymphocyte , proportional hazards model , neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio , peripheral blood cell , peripheral blood , paleontology , biology
Background Peripheral blood cell count ratios, including the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio (LMR), have been reported to be prognostic factors in many malignancies as markers of inflammation and immune status. The aim of this study was to determine whether NLR, PLR, or LMR can be clinical response and prognostic biomarkers of non‐surgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with radiotherapy. Methods 193 non‐surgical ESCC patients who underwent radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The peripheral blood cell count ratios were obtained before, during (weekly) and at the end of the treatment. Then, we compared the subsequent results with the corresponding pretreatment values and computed the rates of change, which were defined as cNLR, cPLR, and cLMR. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for overall survival (OS). Ordinal logistic regression was used to analyze the clinical response. Results In multivariate analysis, cNLR at week 4( P = .026) and week 5( P = .025) during radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS, along with BMI, tumor stage, tumor length, tumor location, and grade of adverse events. Besides, BMI, tumor stage, tumor length, adverse event grade, cNLR at week 4( P = .044) and week 5( P = .013), and cPLR at week 4( P = .034) and week 5( P = .015) were significantly associated with the clinical response in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions The cNLR at weeks 4 and 5 was negatively correlated with the OS and clinical response of non‐surgical ESCC patients treated with radiotherapy. The elevated cPLR at weeks 4 and 5 was only related to poor clinical response.