
Antifungal Activity of Propolis Against Yeasts Isolated From Blood Culture: In Vitro Evaluation
Author(s) -
Mutlu Sariguzel Fatma,
Berk Elife,
Koc Ayes Nedret,
Sav Hafize,
Demir Gonca
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of clinical laboratory analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.536
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1098-2825
pISSN - 0887-8013
DOI - 10.1002/jcla.21889
Subject(s) - propolis , candida tropicalis , candida glabrata , fluconazole , microbiology and biotechnology , broth microdilution , candida parapsilosis , candida albicans , antifungal , in vitro , traditional medicine , biology , minimum inhibitory concentration , medicine , antimicrobial , biochemistry
Background : Due to the failure of available antifungal agents in the treatment of candidemia and the toxic activities of these drugs, a lot of researches are being conducted to develop new nontoxic and effective antifungal agents for optimal control of fungal pathogens. The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vitro antifungal activity of propolis against yeasts isolated from the blood cultures of intensive care unit patients. Methods : Seventy‐six strains were included in this study. The in vitro antifungal activity of propolis, fluconazole (FLU), and itraconazole (ITR) was investigated by the microdilution broth methods (CLSI guidelines M27‐A3 for yeast). The propolis sample was collected from Kayseri, Turkey. Results : Of the 76 isolates, 33 were identified as Candida albicans while 37 were C. parapsilosis , three were C. tropicalis , and three were identified as C. glabrata . The geometric mean range for MIC (μg/ml) with regard to all isolates was 0.077 to 3 μg/ml for FLU and ITR, and 0.375 to 0.70 μg/ml for propolis. It was shown that propolis had significant antifungal activity against all Candida strains and the MIC range of propolis was determined as 0185 to 3 μg/ml. Conclusion : This study demonstrated that propolis had significant antifungal activity against yeasts isolated from blood culture compared with FLU and ITR. The propolis MIC in azole‐resistant strains such as C. glabrata was found lower than the FLU MIC.