z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Author(s) -
Hwang Sang Mee,
Lim Mi Suk,
Han Minsuk,
Hong Yun Ji,
Kim Taek Soo,
Lee Hye Ryun,
Song Eun Young,
Park Kyoung Un,
Song Junghan,
Kim Eui Chong
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of clinical laboratory analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.536
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1098-2825
pISSN - 0887-8013
DOI - 10.1002/jcla.21738
Subject(s) - virus , respiratory system , virology , medicine , influenza a virus , nucleic acid test , covid-19 , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Background Nucleic acid amplification tests have allowed simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses. Methods We compared the results of a liquid bead array xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP; (Luminex Corporation, Toronto, Canada) and a solid microarray Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus (RV+; Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) for the detection of influenza A virus (INF A), influenza B virus (INF B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in 170 respiratory specimens from hospitalized patients. Results Overall, xTAG RVP demonstrated sensitivities and specificities of 97.6 and 100% for INF A, 100 and 99.4% for INF B, and 100 and 100% for RSV, while the Verigene RV+ test sensitivities and specificities were 95.1 and 98.5%, 100.0 and 99.4%, and 97.1 and 100%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the area under the curves between the two assays for each virus ( P = 0.364 for INF A, P = 1.000 for INF B, P = 0.317 for RSV). Comparing the results of two assays, discordant results were present mostly due to subtype assignments and identification of coinfections. The detection of viruses was not significantly different ( P = 1.000) and the virus/subtype assignment showed good agreement with kappa coefficients of 0.908. Conclusion The xTAG RVP and Verigene RV+ showed high sensitivities and specificities, and good overall agreement in detection and identification of INF and RSV. These assays can be used in clinical settings for a reliable detection of respiratory viruses found commonly in hospitalized patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here