z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of a novel kit (TF‐Test) for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections
Author(s) -
Gomes Jancarlo Ferreira,
HoshinoShimizu Sumie,
S. Dias Luiz Cândido,
Araujo Ana Júlia S.A.,
Castilho Vera L.P.,
Neves Fátima A.M.A.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of clinical laboratory analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.536
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1098-2825
pISSN - 0887-8013
DOI - 10.1002/jcla.20011
Subject(s) - roche diagnostics , medicine , veterinary medicine
Abstract Intestinal parasitic infections are currently a source of concern for Public Health agencies in developing and developed countries. Since three ovum‐and‐parasite stool examinations have been demonstrated to provide sensitive results, we designed a practical and economical kit (TF‐Test) that is now commercially available (Immunoassay Com. Ind. Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil). This kit allows the separate collection of three fecal specimens into a preservative solution. The specimens are then pooled, double‐filtered, and concentrated by a single rapid centrifugation process. The TF‐Test was evaluated in four different laboratories in a study using 1,102 outpatients and individuals living in an endemic area for enteroparasitosis. The overall sensitivity found using the TF‐Test (86.2–97.8%) was significantly higher ( P <0.01) than the sensitivity of conventional techniques such as the Coprotest (NL Comércio Exterior Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil) and the combination of Lutz/Hoffman, Faust, and Rugai techniques (De Carli, Diagnóstico Laboratorial das Parasitoses Humanas. Métodos e Técnicas , 1994), which ranged from 48.3% to 75.9%. When the above combined three specimen technique was repeated with three specimens collected on different days, its sensitivity became similar ( P >0.01) to that of the TF‐Test. The kappa index values of agreement for the TF‐Test were consistent ( P <0.01), being higher and ranking in a better position than conventional techniques. The high sensitivity, cost/benefit ratio, and practical aspects demonstrate that the TF‐Test is suitable for individual diagnosis, epidemiological inquiries, or evaluation of chemotherapy in treated communities. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 18:132–138, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here