z-logo
Premium
{2, 3}‐perfect m‐cycle systems are equationally defined for m = 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11 only
Author(s) -
Marzi E. M. Li,
Lindner C. C.,
Rania F.,
Wilson R. M.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of combinatorial designs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.618
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1520-6610
pISSN - 1063-8539
DOI - 10.1002/jcd.20016
Subject(s) - mathematics , combinatorics , class (philosophy) , multiplicative function , quasigroup , order (exchange) , path (computing) , variety (cybernetics) , discrete mathematics , mathematical analysis , computer science , artificial intelligence , statistics , finance , economics , programming language
An m ‐cycle system (S ,C ) of order n is said to be {2,3}‐perfect provided each pair of vertices is connected by a path of length 2 in an m ‐cycle of C and a path of length 3 in an m ‐cycle of C . The class of {2,3}‐perfect m ‐cycle systems is said to be equationally defined provided, there exists a variety of quasigroups V with the property that a finite quasigroup ( Q , $\circ$ , \, /) belongs to V if and only if its multiplicative ( Q , $\circ$ ) part can be constructed from a {2,3}‐perfect m ‐cycle system using the 2‐construction ( a $\circ$ a  =  a for all a  ∈  Q and if a  ≠  b , a $\circ$ b  =  c and b $\circ$ a  =  d if and only if the m ‐cycle (…, d , x , a , b , y , c , …) ∈  C ). The object of this paper is to show that the class of {2,3}‐perfect m ‐cycle systems cannot be equationally defined for all m  ≥ 10, m  ≠ 11. This combined with previous results shows that {2, 3}‐perfect m ‐cycle systems are equationally defined for m  = 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11 only. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom