z-logo
Premium
Atomic Latin squares of order eleven
Author(s) -
Maenhaut Barbara M.,
Wanless Ian M.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of combinatorial designs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.618
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1520-6610
pISSN - 1063-8539
DOI - 10.1002/jcd.10064
Subject(s) - mathematics , combinatorics , hamiltonian path , latin square , factorization , orthogonal array , square (algebra) , square number , magic square , partition (number theory) , discrete mathematics , graph , algorithm , geometry , statistics , rumen , chemistry , food science , taguchi methods , fermentation
A Latin square is pan‐Hamiltonian if the permutation which defines row i relative to row j consists of a single cycle for every i  ≠  j . A Latin square is atomic if all of its conjugates are pan‐Hamiltonian. We give a complete enumeration of atomic squares for order 11, the smallest order for which there are examples distinct from the cyclic group. We find that there are seven main classes, including the three that were previously known. A perfect 1‐ factorization of a graph is a decomposition of that graph into matchings such that the union of any two matchings is a Hamiltonian cycle. Each pan‐Hamiltonian Latin square of order n describes a perfect 1‐ factorization of K n , n , and vice versa. Perfect 1‐factorizations of K n , n can be constructed from a perfect 1‐factorization of K n +1 . Six of the seven main classes of atomic squares of order 11 can be obtained in this way. For each atomic square of order 11, we find the largest set of Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares (MOLS) involving that square. We discuss algorithms for counting orthogonal mates, and discover the number of orthogonal mates possessed by the cyclic squares of orders up to 11 and by Parker's famous turn‐square. We find that the number of atomic orthogonal mates possessed by a Latin square is not a main class invariant. We also define a new sort of Latin square, called a pairing square, which is mapped to its transpose by an involution acting on the symbols. We show that pairing squares are often orthogonal mates for symmetric Latin squares. Finally, we discover connections between our atomic squares and Franklin's diagonally cyclic self‐orthogonal squares, and we correct a theorem of Longyear which uses tactical representations to identify self‐orthogonal Latin squares in the same main class as a given Latin square. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here