Premium
An Instrumental Correction for the Determination of Mercury in Biological and Sediment Samples Using Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
Author(s) -
Chen MengHsien,
Chou ChiuLong
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of the chinese chemical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.329
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 2192-6549
pISSN - 0009-4536
DOI - 10.1002/jccs.200000154
Subject(s) - chemistry , mercury (programming language) , atomic absorption spectroscopy , cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectroscopy , analytical chemistry (journal) , environmental chemistry , detection limit , certified reference materials , spectrophotometry , chromatography , physics , quantum mechanics , computer science , programming language
Low recovery rate and inconsistent measurements were found in the determination of mercury by method of cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry using the hydride formation system (Hitachi HFS‐2, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo). To overcome this problem of insufficient reaction time we developed a simple T‐joint device attaching to the commercial HFS‐2 system for the determination of mercury in various biological tissues and sediment samples. The T‐joint device was designed to combine sample and reductant injection which increased the reaction time of the sample allowing a complete formation of mercury vapor and speeding up the analysis process in comparison to the traditional cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometric method. Recoveries of mercury were in the range 95% ‐ 100%. The corrected procedure gave precise and accurate readings with several certified reference materials: NIES No. 2 from the Japan Environment Agency; IAEA‐356 from the International Atomic Energy Association, and DOLT‐2, DORM‐2, TORT‐2, PACS‐1 and MESS‐2 from the National Research Council of Canada. Simple acid digestion methods were developed based on the sample Hg level and the nature of the sample. The sample detection limits were 0.0125 μg g −1 fresh weight and 0.0625 μg g −1 dry weight for biological samples, and as low as 0.0125 μg g −1 dry weight for sediment samples. These analytical protocols we established met the general requirements in environmental research and monitoring of mercury pollution.