Premium
Implementation of reaction field methods in quantum chemistry computer codes
Author(s) -
De Vries A. H.,
Van Duijnen P. Th.,
Juffer A. H.,
Rullmann J. A. C.,
Dijkman J. P.,
Merenga H.,
Thole B. T.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of computational chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1096-987X
pISSN - 0192-8651
DOI - 10.1002/jcc.540160105
Subject(s) - hamiltonian (control theory) , statistical physics , polarizability , quantum , quantum mechanics , dipole , wave function , physics , theoretical physics , mathematics , molecule , mathematical optimization
The embedding of a quantum mechanically described subsystem by classical representations of its surroundings is reviewed. The choices for a distributed monopole representation and a distributed (group) polarizability representation, as well as the continuum approach to model bulk effects, are discussed. Focus is on the practical implementation of the classical description in quantum chemistry codes (in particular, HONDO8.1). Expressions are given for the self‐consistent coupling between the classical partitions (dipole polarizabilities and boundary surface dipoles and charges) and for the coupling between classical and quantum partitions. The latter is mediated through expanded, rather than exact, potentials and fields. In this way, the computation of only a limited number of formal interactions between unit charge distributions located at the expansion centers suffices to evaluate the reaction field contributions. The electronic part of the coupling can be included in the Hamiltonian via the Fock matrix. The field operators, as well as the one‐ and two‐electron matrix elements over the basis functions, are simple. The expressions for these are given explicitly. Nonequilibrium potentials and Monte Carlo sampling over classical degrees of freedom have been added to better mimic experimental conditions. © 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.