Premium
Comparison of two force fields by molecular dynamics simulations of glucose crystals: Effect of using ewald sums
Author(s) -
Kouwijzer M.L.C.E.,
Van Eijck B.P.,
Kroes S.J.,
Kroon J.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of computational chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1096-987X
pISSN - 0192-8651
DOI - 10.1002/jcc.540141104
Subject(s) - force field (fiction) , molecular dynamics , hydrogen bond , cutoff , chemistry , neutron diffraction , field (mathematics) , computational chemistry , physics , crystallography , molecule , quantum mechanics , crystal structure , mathematics , pure mathematics
To compare the GROMOS force field with one designed by Ha et al., molecular dynamics simulations of α‐D‐glucose anhydrate and monohydrate crystals were performed. Also, the long‐range interactions were calculated both with a cutoff approximation and with Ewald summations. The results are compared with results obtained experimentally by neutron and X‐ray diffraction. The force‐field parameters had been optimized with the cutoff approximation; this apparently led to worse results when the Ewald summations were used. However, in all simulations the symmetry was roughly preserved and the mean atomic coordinates and thermal parameters, bond angles, and dihedrals without hydrogen atoms were rather well reproduced. The dihedrals with hydrogen atoms exhibited conformational transitions, which resulted in a disordered hydrogen bonding scheme. In general, the GROMOS force field performed better than the Ha force field. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.