z-logo
Premium
Does CH   5 + prefer a C 2v rather than a C s structure?
Author(s) -
Von Ragué Schleyer Paul,
De M. Carneiro José Walkimar
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of computational chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1096-987X
pISSN - 0192-8651
DOI - 10.1002/jcc.540130810
Subject(s) - materials science , crystallography , chemistry , physics
The closely related C s ( 1 ) and C 2v ( 3 ) structures of CH   5 +have been reinvestigated at many ab initio levels using MP2/6‐31G** and MP2/6‐311 + + G(2 df , 2 pd ) geometries. The largest basis sets employed were 6‐311G(3 df , 2 p ), 6‐311 + + G(3 df , 3 pd ), and the Dunning “correlation consistent” polarized triple‐split valence basis set (cc‐ p VTZ). Electron correlation was probed at the MP4 level, but the QCISD method was also used with the largest basis sets. While electron correlation favors 3 over 1 by about 2 kcal/mol, the correlated relative energies with all basis sets employed range from 0.36–1.03 kcal/mol in favor of 1 . The best estimate of this difference, 0.86 kcal/mol, is essentially identical with the (scaled) zero‐point energy difference, 0.84 kcal/mol, favoring 3 over 1 . These results indicate that 1 and 3 have almost exactly the same energy at 0 K. Our best value for the dissociation energy of CH   5 +is 42.0 kcal/mol [QCISD(T)/6‐311 + + G(3 df , 3 pd )//MP2(fu)/6‐311 + + G(2 df , 2 pd ), corrected to 298 K], which agrees very well with the experimental value. © 1992 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom