Premium
Evaluation of atomic pressure in the multiple time‐step integration algorithm
Author(s) -
Andoh Yoshimichi,
Yoshii Noriyuki,
Yamada Atsushi,
Okazaki Susumu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of computational chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1096-987X
pISSN - 0192-8651
DOI - 10.1002/jcc.24731
Subject(s) - verlet integration , holonomic constraints , reduction (mathematics) , holonomic , isobaric process , isothermal process , equations of motion , numerical integration , range (aeronautics) , thermodynamic integration , molecular dynamics , algorithm , mathematics , physics , chemistry , classical mechanics , thermodynamics , computational chemistry , mathematical analysis , quantum mechanics , materials science , geometry , composite material
In molecular dynamics (MD) calculations, reduction in calculation time per MD loop is essential. A multiple time‐step (MTS) integration algorithm, the RESPA (Tuckerman and Berne, J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 1990–2001), enables reductions in calculation time by decreasing the frequency of time‐consuming long‐range interaction calculations. However, the RESPA MTS algorithm involves uncertainties in evaluating the atomic interaction‐based pressure (i.e., atomic pressure) of systems with and without holonomic constraints. It is not clear which intermediate forces and constraint forces in the MTS integration procedure should be used to calculate the atomic pressure. In this article, we propose a series of equations to evaluate the atomic pressure in the RESPA MTS integration procedure on the basis of its equivalence to the Velocity‐Verlet integration procedure with a single time step (STS). The equations guarantee time‐reversibility even for the system with holonomic constrants. Furthermore, we generalize the equations to both (i) arbitrary number of inner time steps and (ii) arbitrary number of force components (RESPA levels). The atomic pressure calculated by our equations with the MTS integration shows excellent agreement with the reference value with the STS, whereas pressures calculated using the conventional ad hoc equations deviated from it. Our equations can be extended straightforwardly to the MTS integration algorithm for the isothermal NVT and isothermal–isobaric NPT ensembles. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.