z-logo
Premium
Predicting adsorption enthalpies on silicalite and HZSM‐5: A benchmark study on DFT strategies addressing dispersion interactions
Author(s) -
Chiu Chengchau,
Vayssilov Georgi N.,
Genest Alexander,
Borgna Armando,
Rösch Notker
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of computational chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1096-987X
pISSN - 0192-8651
DOI - 10.1002/jcc.23558
Subject(s) - adsorption , zeolite , density functional theory , dispersion (optics) , thermodynamics , chemistry , molecule , computational chemistry , materials science , physics , organic chemistry , catalysis , quantum mechanics
We evaluated the accuracy of periodic density functional calculations for adsorption enthalpies of water, alkanes, and alcohols in silicalite and HZSM‐5 zeolites using a gradient‐corrected density functional with empirical dispersion corrections (PBE‐D) as well as a nonlocal correlation functional (vdW‐DF2). Results of both approaches agree in acceptable fashion with experimental adsorption energies of alcohols in silicalite, but the adsorption energies for n ‐alkanes in both zeolite models are overestimated, by 21−46 kJ mol −1 . For PBE‐D calculations, the adsorption of alkanes is exclusively determined by the empirical dispersion term, while the generalized gradient approximation‐DFT part is purely repulsive, preventing the molecule to come too close to the zeolite walls. The vdW‐DF2 results are comparable to those of PBE‐D calculations, but the latter values are slightly closer to the experiment in most cases. Thus, both computational approaches are unable to reproduce available experimental adsorption energies of alkanes in silicalite and HZSM‐5 zeolite with chemical accuracy. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here