z-logo
Premium
Nonclassical fullerenes with a heptagon violating the pentagon adjacency penalty rule
Author(s) -
Gan LiHua,
Zhao JianQiang,
Hui Qun
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of computational chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1096-987X
pISSN - 0192-8651
DOI - 10.1002/jcc.21459
Subject(s) - fullerene , pentagon , adjacency list , chemistry , computational chemistry , combinatorics , chemical physics , mathematics , geometry , organic chemistry
Nonclassical fullerenes with heptagon(s) and their derivatives have attracted increasing attention, and the studies on them are performing to enrich the chemistry of carbon. Density functional theory calculations are performed on nonclassical fullerenes C n ( n = 46, 48, 50, and 52) to give insight into their structures and stability. The calculated results demonstrate that the classical isomers generally satisfy the pentagon adjacency penalty rule. However, the nonclassical isomers with a heptagon are more energetically favorable than the classical ones with the same number of pentagon–pentagon bonds (B 55 bonds), and many of them are even more stable than some classical isomers with fewer B 55 bonds. The nonclassical isomers with the lowest energy are higher in energy than the classical ones with the lowest energy, because they have more B 55 bonds. Generally, the HOMO–LUMO gaps of the former are larger than those of the latter. The sphericity and asphericity are unable to rationalize the unique stability of the nonclassical fullerenes with a heptagon. The pyramidization angles of the vertices shared by two pentagons and one heptagon are smaller than those of the vertices shared by two pentagons and one hexagon. It is concluded that the strain in the fused pentagons can be released by the adjacent heptagons partly, and consequently, it is a common phenomenon for nonclassical fullerenes to violate the pentagon adjacent penalty rule. These findings are heuristic and conducive to search energetically favorable isomers of C n , especially as n is 62, 64, 66, and 68, respectively. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here