z-logo
Premium
Quantum vs. classical models of the nitro group for proton chemical shift calculations and conformational analysis
Author(s) -
Mobli Mehdi,
Abraham Raymond J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of computational chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.907
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1096-987X
pISSN - 0192-8651
DOI - 10.1002/jcc.20177
Subject(s) - chemical shift , chemistry , nitro , basis set , steric effects , computational chemistry , molecule , proton , ab initio , quantum chemical , group (periodic table) , density functional theory , stereochemistry , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , alkyl
Abstract A model based on classical concepts is derived to describe the effect of the nitro group on proton chemical shifts. The calculated chemical shifts are then compared to ab initio (GIAO) calculated chemical shifts. The accuracy of the two models is assessed using proton chemical shifts of a set of rigid organic nitro compounds that are fully assigned in CDCl 3 at 700 MHz. The two methods are then used to evaluate the accuracy of different popular post‐SCF methods (B3LYP and MP2) and molecular mechanics methods (MMX and MMFF94) in calculating the molecular structure of a set of sterically crowded nitro aromatic compounds. Both models perform well on the rigid molecules used as a test set, although when using the GIAO method a general overestimation of the deshielding of protons near the nitro group is observed. The analysis of the sterically crowded molecules shows that the very popular B3LYP/6‐31G(d,p) method produces very poor twist angles for these, and that using a larger basis set [6‐311++G(2d,p)] gives much more reasonable results. The MP2 calculations, on the other hand, overestimate the twist angles, which for these compounds compensates for the deshielding effect generally observed for protons near electronegative atoms when using the GIAO method at the B3LYP/6‐311++G(2d,p) level. The most accurate results are found when the structures are calculated using B3LYP/6‐311++G(2d,p) level of theory, and the chemical shifts are calculated using the CHARGE program based on classical models. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 26: 389–398, 2005

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here