Premium
Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells application in hematopoietic stem cells expansion on nanofiber three‐dimensional scaffold
Author(s) -
Darvish Maryam,
Payandeh Zahra,
Soleimanifar Fatemeh,
Taheri Behnaz,
Soleimani Masoud,
Islami Maryam
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of cellular biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.028
H-Index - 165
eISSN - 1097-4644
pISSN - 0730-2312
DOI - 10.1002/jcb.28487
Subject(s) - mesenchymal stem cell , flow cytometry , stem cell , haematopoiesis , umbilical cord , cxcr4 , scaffold , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , bone marrow , nanofiber , transplantation , biomedical engineering , immunology , biology , materials science , medicine , nanotechnology , immune system , surgery , chemokine
Umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) transplantation (HSCTs) is considered as a therapeutic strategy for malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Nevertheless, the low number of HSCs obtained from each unit of UCB can be a major challenge for using these cells in adults. In addition, UCB is a rich source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) creating hopes for nonaggressive and painless treatment in tissue engineering compared with bone marrow MSCs. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of UCB‐MSCs application in UCB‐HSCs expansion on the nanoscaffold that mimics the cell's natural niche. To achieve this goal, after flow cytometry confirmation of isolated HSCs from UCB, they were expanded on three‐dimensional (3D) poly‐ l ‐lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds fabricated by electrospinning and two‐dimensional (2D)‐culture systems, such as (1) HSCs‐MSCs culturing on the scaffold, (2) HSCs culturing on the scaffold, (3) HSCs‐MSCs culturing on 2D, and (4) HSCs culturing on 2D. After 7 days, real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to evaluate the CXCR4 gene expression in the mentioned groups. Moreover, for the next validation, the number of total HSCs, 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay, scanning electron microscopy imaging, and colony‐forming unit assay were evaluated as well. The results of the study indicated that UCB‐MSCs interaction with HSCs in 3D‐culture systems led to the highest expansion of UCB‐HSCs on day 7. Flow cytometry results showed the highest purity of HSCs cocultured with MSCs. Real‐time PCR showed a significant increase in gene expression of CXCR4 in the mentioned group. The highest viability and clonogenicity were detected in the mentioned group too. Considered together, our results suggest that UCB‐HSCs and MSCs coculturing on PLLA scaffold could provide a proper microenvironment that efficiently promotes UCB‐HSCs expansion and UCB‐MSCs can also be considered as a promising candidate for UCB‐HSCTs.