z-logo
Premium
Pentapeptide insertion mutagenesis of the Hoxa1 protein: Mapping of transcription activation and DNA‐binding regulatory domains
Author(s) -
Lambert Barbara,
Vandeputte Julie,
Desmet PierreMarie,
Hallet Bernard,
Remacle Sophie,
Rezsohazy René
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of cellular biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.028
H-Index - 165
eISSN - 1097-4644
pISSN - 0730-2312
DOI - 10.1002/jcb.22563
Subject(s) - pentapeptide repeat , dna , mutagenesis , transcription (linguistics) , transcription factor , dna binding protein , chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , genetics , mutation , gene , biochemistry , peptide , linguistics , philosophy
The mode of action of Hoxa1, like that of most Hox proteins, remains poorly characterized. In an effort to identify functional determinants contributing to the activity of Hoxa1 as a transcription factor, we generated 18 pentapeptide insertion mutants of the Hoxa1 protein and we assayed them in transfected cells for their activity on target enhancers from the EphA2 and Hoxb1 genes known to respond to Hoxa1 in the developing hindbrain. Only four mutants displayed a complete loss‐of‐function. Three of them contained an insertion in the homeodomain of Hoxa1, whereas the fourth loss‐of‐function mutant harbored an insertion in the very N‐terminal end of the protein. Transcription activation assays in yeast further revealed that the integrity of both the N‐terminal end and homeodomain is required for Hoxa1‐mediated transcriptional activation. Furthermore, an insertion in the serine–threonine–proline rich C‐terminal extremity of Hoxa1 induced an increase in activity in mammalian cells as well as in the yeast assay. The C‐terminal extremity thus modulates the transcriptional activation capacity of the protein. Finally, electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that the N‐terminal extremity of the protein also exerts a modulatory influence on DNA binding by Hoxa1–Pbx1a heterodimers. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 484–496, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here