z-logo
Premium
Implications of Clawback Adoption in Executive Compensation Contracts: A Survey of Recent Research
Author(s) -
Prescott Gregory L.,
Vann Carol E.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of corporate accounting and finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1097-0053
pISSN - 1044-8136
DOI - 10.1002/jcaf.22312
Subject(s) - accounting , corporate governance , executive compensation , business , compensation (psychology) , commission , quality (philosophy) , finance , psychology , philosophy , epistemology , psychoanalysis
While clawback provisions have been used in legal cases for decades, only after the passage of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd‐Frank Act of 2010 has the idea of clawback provisions in executive compensation contracts begun to talk hold in the U.S. Although the Securities and Exchange Commission has yet to implement final rules regarding clawback provisions for public companies, in recent years academic researchers have begun to investigate how the voluntary adoption of clawback provisions might impact financial reporting quality, compensation paid to covered executives, firm value, and a host of other firm‐level factors. The purpose of this article is to review select relevant clawback research published in premiere accounting and finance academic journals in recent years to better gauge the implications of clawback adoption and to attempt to discern any corporate governance effects of clawback adoption.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here