z-logo
Premium
A Millennial Mistake: Three Arguments Against Radical Social Constructivism
Author(s) -
North Alex
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of counseling and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.805
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1556-6676
pISSN - 0748-9633
DOI - 10.1002/jcad.12067
Subject(s) - constructivism (international relations) , mistake , scholarship , social constructivism , epistemology , sociology , political science , philosophy , law , politics , international relations
Recent scholars have argued that counseling has begun to embrace social constructivism as a paradigm for counseling. However, this commitment to social constructivist tenets may be both premature and undesirable. This article provides a critique of a dominant branch of social constructivism: radical social constructivism. Three arguments are presented establishing that radical social constructivism leads to logically impossible conclusions, violates counseling's moral convictions, and denies secure scholarship in related fields.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here