Premium
Summary of results of 1991 ASFA apheresis survey
Author(s) -
Malchesky Paul S.,
Skibinski Christine I.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of clinical apheresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.697
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1098-1101
pISSN - 0733-2459
DOI - 10.1002/jca.2920080208
Subject(s) - apheresis , medicine , plasmapheresis , therapeutic plasma exchange , plateletpheresis , directory , pharmacy , family medicine , intensive care medicine , medical emergency , surgery , immunology , platelet , computer science , antibody , operating system
As part of gathering data for its Networking Directory, the Registry/Directory Committee of the American Society for Apheresis solicited data on the types of apheresis procedures performed, equipment used, and diseases treated in the year 1991. In this voluntary solicitation of the 266 centers responding, 94% were from the United States. For those centers reporting exact numbers of procedures performed out of all institutions doing the procedures 48, 221 therapeutic and 330,702 donor procedures were reported. The dominant type of equipment being used is the centrifugal type. For therapeutic procedures plasma exchange is the most prevalent procedure and for donor procedures it is plateletpheresis. For therapeutics, Guillain‐Barre syndrome was the most prevalent disease treated by plasmapheresis and leukemias by cytapheresis. The survey methodology proved to be valuable in gathering the data on a voluntary basis. With subsequent surveys and refinement of its methodology the apheresis practices in the United States could be assessed quantitatively to provide information on the number and types of procedures being carried out. Such information is required to assess the impact of apheresis technology on health care, to project trends, and to review the cost impact of this technology. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.