Premium
Therapeutic plasma exchange in acute on chronic liver failure
Author(s) -
Stahl Klaus,
Busch Markus,
Fuge Jan,
Schneider Andrea,
Manns Michael P.,
Seeliger Benjamin,
Schmidt Julius J.,
Wiesner Olaf,
Schmidt Bernhard M.W.,
Taubert Richard,
Vondran Florian W.R.,
Hoeper Marius M.,
David Sascha
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical apheresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.697
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1098-1101
pISSN - 0733-2459
DOI - 10.1002/jca.21799
Subject(s) - medicine , decompensation , retrospective cohort study , cirrhosis , gastroenterology , liver failure , liver transplantation , surgery , transplantation
Background Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been identified as a distinct syndrome due to acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis accompanied by extra‐hepatic organ failure, primarily caused by an overwhelming systemic immune response. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial to improve transplant free survival in acute liver failure. Here we investigated if TPE might have comparable beneficial effects in patients with ACLF. Methods Thirty‐one patients with ACLF that were treated with TPE were enrolled into this retrospective analysis and 1:1 matched to an ACLF cohort treated with standard medical therapy (SMT) only. Results Patients considered for a bridge to recovery (n = 21 each group) approach had a 30‐day mortality >90% that was not improved by TPE ( P = .185). Deaths occurred in the SMT group at significant earlier time points compared to the patients treated with TPE (mortality at 5 days: 33.3% for TPE and 66.7% for SMT, P = .048). However, patients who received TPE as a bridge to transplant strategy (n = 10) survived in 60% of cases and demonstrated 24 hours after study inclusion a stabilization of organ dysfunction (organ failures at inclusion: 4 (3‐5) vs 24 hours after inclusion: 3 (2‐4), P = .031 and CLIF‐C‐ACLF score: 64 (49‐76) vs 54 (49‐66), P = .043) not seen in SMT patients. Conclusions Although these retrospective data need to be interpreted with caution, they suggest that TPE in ACLF patients is feasible but not suitable as a bridge to recovery strategy. In selected patients TPE might assist as bridge to transplant.