z-logo
Premium
Triosephosphate isomerase tyrosine nitration induced by heme–NaNO 2 –H 2 O 2 or peroxynitrite: Effects of different natural phenolic compounds
Author(s) -
Gao Wanxia,
Zhao Jie,
Li Hailing,
Gao Zhonghong
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.526
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1099-0461
pISSN - 1095-6670
DOI - 10.1002/jbt.21893
Subject(s) - peroxynitrite , nitration , chemistry , heme , tyrosine , hemeprotein , biochemistry , stereochemistry , organic chemistry , enzyme , superoxide
Peroxynitrite and heme peroxidases (or heme)–H 2 O 2 –NaNO 2 system are the two common ways to cause protein tyrosine nitration in vitro , but the effects of antioxidants on reducing these two pathways‐induced protein nitration and oxidation are controversial. Both nitrating systems can dose‐dependently induce triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) nitration, however, heme–H 2 O 2 –NaNO 2 was less destructive to protein secondary structures and led to more nitrated tyrosine residue than 3‐morpholinosydnonimine hydrochloride (SIN‐1, a peroxynitrite donor). Both of desferrioxamine and catechin could inhibit TIM nitration induced by heme–H 2 O 2 –NaNO 2 and SIN‐1 and protein oxidation induced by SIN‐1, but promoted heme–H 2 O 2 –NaNO 2 ‐induced protein oxidation. Moreover, the antagonism of natural phenolic compounds on SIN‐1‐induced tyrosine nitration was consistent with their radical scavenging ability, but no similar consensus was found in heme–H 2 O 2 –NaNO 2 ‐induced nitration. Our results indicated that peroxynitrite and heme–H 2 O 2 –NaNO 2 ‐induced protein nitration was different, and the later one could be a better model for anti‐nitration compounds screening.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom