z-logo
Premium
Purification and catalytic properties of glutathione transferase from the hepatopancreas of crayfish macrobrachium vollenhovenii (herklots)
Author(s) -
Adewale Isaac Olusanjo,
Afolayan Adeyinka
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.526
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1099-0461
pISSN - 1095-6670
DOI - 10.1002/jbt.20044
Subject(s) - chemistry , size exclusion chromatography , glutathione , enzyme , hepatopancreas , sephadex , chromatofocusing , chromatography , dtnb , isoelectric point , dimer , affinity chromatography , biochemistry , stereochemistry , organic chemistry
Glutathione transferase from the hepatopancreas of fresh water crayfish Macrobrachium vollenhovenii was purified to apparent homogeneity by ion‐exchange chromatography on DEAE‐cellulose and by gel filtration on Sephadex G‐100. The enzyme appeared to be a homodimer with molecular weight (Mr) of 46.0 ± 1.4 kDa and a subunit Mr of 24.1 ± 0.35 kDa. Chromatofocusing of the apparently pure enzyme revealed microheterogeneity and resolved it into two isozymic peaks, which were eluted at pH 8.36 and 8.22 respectively. Inhibition studies showed that the I 50 value for cibacron blue, S ‐hexylglutathione, hematin, and N ‐ethylmaleimide (NEM) were 0.01 μM, 340μM, 5 μM and 33 mM respectively. Out of the several substrates tested, only 1‐chloro‐2,4‐dinitrobenzene (CDNB) and 7‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzo‐2‐oxa‐1,3‐diazole could be conjugated with glutathione. Chemical modification studies with DTNB revealed that two sulphydryl groups per dimer were essential to the activity of the enzymes. On the basis of structural and catalytic characteristics, M. vollenhovenii GST seems close, tentatively, to the omega and zeta classes of GST. Initial‐velocity studies of the enzyme are consistent with a steady‐state random kinetic mechanism. Denaturation and renaturation studies with guanidine HCl (Gdn‐HCl) revealed that though low Gdn‐HCl concentrations (less than 0.5 M) denatured the enzyme, the enzyme was able to renature completely (100%). At higher concentration of the denaturant (0.5–4 M), refolding studies indicated that complete renaturation was not achieved. The extent of renaturation was however a function of protein concentration. Our results are consistent with a three‐state unfolding process. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 18:332–344, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/jbt.20044

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here