Premium
Bone structure and turnover in the distal radius and iliac crest: A histomorphometric study
Author(s) -
Schnitzler Christine M.,
Biddulph Sydney L.,
Mesquita Julia M.,
Gear K. Ann
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of bone and mineral research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.882
H-Index - 241
eISSN - 1523-4681
pISSN - 0884-0431
DOI - 10.1002/jbmr.5650111120
Subject(s) - osteoid , apposition , iliac crest , bone histomorphometry , osteoblast , medicine , anatomy , osteoclast , resorption , medullary cavity , bone remodeling , bone resorption , osteoporosis , chemistry , trabecular bone , biochemistry , receptor , in vitro
In bone grafting procedures of the wrist, the distal radius would be a more convenient graft donor site than the conventionally used iliac crest. We compared tetracycline‐labeled bone biopsies from these two sites in 18 white patients (12 males, 6 females, aged 26–66 years) undergoing bone grafting procedures of the wrist. Fourteen had had previous trauma, 1 osteonecrosis of the lunate, 2 mild rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 a brachial plexus palsy. The specimens were processed undecalcified and examined by routine histomorphometry for bone structure, static and dynamic bone turnover variables, and marrow cellularity. We found that bone from the distal radius had thinner cortices ( p = 0.0001), lower bone volume ( p = 0.01), thinner trabeculae ( p = 0.029), greater trabecular separation ( p = 0.015), and lower wall thickness ( p = 0.0001), marrow cellularity ( p = 0.0001), osteoid volume ( p = 0.01), osteoid surface ( p = 0.02), osteoid thickness ( p = 0.0002), osteoblast surface ( p = 0.001), eroded surface ( p = 0.01), osteoclast surface ( p = 0.012), mineral apposition rate ( p = 0.0002), double‐labeled surface ( p = 0.0005), single‐labeled surface ( p = 0.006), bone formation rate ( p = 0.0005), adjusted apposition rate ( p = 0.0001), longer mineralization lag time ( p = 0.012), and greater activation frequency ( p = 0.003). Prolonged mineralization lag time in the radius was associated with thin osteoid seams and low adjusted apposition rates and was therefore attributable to a low level of osteoblast activity rather than to osteomalacia. We conclude that bone from the distal radius was structurally inferior to and had lower turnover than the iliac crest bone. We suggest that where a graft has to provide immediate structural integrity, the iliac crest is the preferred donor site. However, where bone graft is to be compacted into a small cavitary defect, distal radial bone may be an adequate alternative. A clinical study is needed to confirm this assumption. (J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1761–1768)