Premium
Dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry of the rat: Accuracy, precision, and measurement of bone loss
Author(s) -
Griffin Michael G.,
Kimble Robert,
Hopfer Wendy,
Pacifici Roberto
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of bone and mineral research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.882
H-Index - 241
eISSN - 1523-4681
pISSN - 0884-0431
DOI - 10.1002/jbmr.5650080704
Subject(s) - dual energy x ray absorptiometry , accuracy and precision , dual (grammatical number) , dual energy , x ray , physics , materials science , nuclear medicine , medicine , bone mineral , optics , osteoporosis , pathology , art , literature , quantum mechanics
Dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is now an established method of measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in humans. We have applied the technique to measuring BMD in the rat. The short‐term precision of the technique was assessed by calculating the BMD coefficient of variation at the rat spine (1.20%), total femur (0.52%), proximal femur (1.16%), midfemur (1.00%), distal femur (0.96%), and proximal tibia (2.2%). The long‐term precision of femoral measurements in rat cadavers over a 4 week period was 0.72% for the total femur and 1.2% for the distal femur. The accuracy of the technique was assessed by comparing DEXA‐measured bone mineral content (BMC) in vitro and in vivo with ashed BMC. Results indicated a highly significant positive correlation between in vitro DEXA measurements and ash BMC ( r = 0.99) and between in vivo DEXA measurements and ash BMC ( r = 0.89). The ability of the technique to detect bone loss was assessed at the femoral site by comparing the BMD of ovariectomized (OVX) and sham‐operated rats at baseline and at a 1 month follow‐up. There was no significant difference in BMD between the groups at baseline. However, at 1 month follow‐up the OVX group showed a significant ( p < 0.001) decline in BMD at the distal femur (‐8.6%) and in the total femur (‐4.8%) compared with sham‐operated rats. A comparison of retired breeder female rats with age‐matched nulliparous rats indicated that the BMD of retired breeder rats was significantly lower than that of virgin females at all femoral sites ( p < 0.01). The results suggest that the DEXA technique has the precision and accuracy necessary to study changes in rat BMD. Furthermore, the technique can be used quickly and noninvasively to detect a bone loss following ovariectomy in the rat, and the distal femur may be an optimal site for detecting such a bone loss.