Premium
Lateral dual‐photon absorptiometry: A new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine
Author(s) -
Uebelhart D.,
Duboeuf F.,
Meunier P. J.,
Delmas P. D.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of bone and mineral research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.882
H-Index - 241
eISSN - 1523-4681
pISSN - 0884-0431
DOI - 10.1002/jbmr.5650050515
Subject(s) - bone mineral , osteoporosis , medicine , nuclear medicine , lumbar , lumbar spine , radiography , skeleton (computer programming) , anatomy , lumbar vertebrae , bone density , bone disease , radiology , surgery
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine by dual‐photon absorptiometry (DPA) using a radioactive source and more recently an x‐ray tube (DEXA) is a useful noninvasive technique to assess bone loss in vertebral osteoporosis. Because an anteroposterior (AP) projection is used, DPA measures not only the mainly trabecular bone of the vertebral body but also the cortical bone of the posterior processes, which does not contribute to the development of crushed fractures. Using a DPA apparatus equipped with a 153 Gd source coupled with an 18‐detector system that provides better collection efficiency for the narrow beam of 153 Gd radiation, we have developed a technique measuring the BMD of the vertebral body of L2, L3, and L4 on a lateral projection based on previous studies using radiographic photodensitometry for lateral spine. The precision of the method — 1.7% in vivo and 0.88% in vitro — is similar to that obtained with the AP projection (respectively, 1.7 and 1.0%). Lateral BMD decreased with age in 143 normal women and was best accounted for by a cubic curve ( r = −0.51, p < 0.001). The age‐related bone loss between 30 and 80 years of age was much higher with the lateral (‐44%) than with the AP (‐22%) projection, a pattern consistent with the greater trabecular than cortical age‐related bone loss. When osteoporotics (OP) were compared to age‐matched normal women, the decreased in BMD was larger with the lateral (‐30%) than with the AP projection (‐23%), but in terms of Z scores, no difference could be found between both projections. Correlation between AP and lateral BMD was highly significant in the normal women ( r = 0.58, p < 0.001) but not in the OP ( r = 0.22, NS), indicating a predominant loss of the spongy bone in patients with vertebral osteoporosis. The influence of an osteoarthritis of the posterior processes on BMD according to the projection was assessed in 15 patients; expressed in Z score, the mean value was high with the AP projection (+1.26 SD) but normal (+0.20 SD) with the lateral projection, confirming that posterior OA interferes substantially with AP BMD. In conclusion, BMD measurement of the vertebral body is achievable by lateral DPA with a good precision. Applied to the new DEXA densitometers, this technique should be even more precise and accurate. Lateral DPA avoids the interference of posterior OA, a common problem in the elderly, and seems to be more sensitive than conventional anteroposterior DPA to detect early vertebral bone loss. It should be valuable in the clinical investigation of osteoporosis.