z-logo
Premium
Cortical Bone Assessed With Clinical Computed Tomography at the Proximal Femur
Author(s) -
Johannesdottir Fjola,
Turmezei Tom,
Poole Kenneth ES
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of bone and mineral research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.882
H-Index - 241
eISSN - 1523-4681
pISSN - 0884-0431
DOI - 10.1002/jbmr.2199
Subject(s) - femur , cortical bone , medicine , osteoporosis , femoral neck , bone density , quantitative computed tomography , hip fracture , trochanter , statistical parametric mapping , lesser trochanter , orthodontics , radiology , anatomy , surgery , magnetic resonance imaging
Hip fractures are the most serious of all fragility fractures in older people of both sexes. Trips, stumbles, and falls result in fractures of the femoral neck or trochanter, and the incidence of these two common fractures is increasing worldwide as populations age. Although clinical risk factors and chance are important in causation, the ability of a femur to resist fracture also depends on the size and spatial distribution of the bone, its intrinsic material properties, and the loads applied. Over the past two decades, clinical quantitative computed tomography (QCT) studies of living volunteers have provided insight into how the femur changes with advancing age to leave older men and women at increased risk of hip fractures. In this review, we focus on patterns of cortical bone loss associated with hip fracture, age‐related changes in cortical bone, and the effects of drugs used to treat osteoporosis. There are several methodologies available to measure cortical bone in vivo using QCT. Most techniques quantify bone density (g/cm 3 ), mass (g), and thickness (mm) in selected, predefined or “traditional” regions of interest such as the “femoral neck” or “total hip” region. A recent alternative approach termed “computational anatomy,” uses parametric methods to identify systematic differences, before displaying statistically significant regions as color‐scaled maps of density, mass, or thickness on or within a representative femur model. This review will highlight discoveries made using both traditional and computational anatomy methods, focusing on cortical bone of the proximal femur. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here