Premium
Effect of short glass fibers on the polymerization shrinkage stress of dental composite
Author(s) -
Shouha Paul S. R.,
Ellakwa Ayman E.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part b: applied biomaterials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1552-4981
pISSN - 1552-4973
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.b.33723
Subject(s) - shrinkage , composite material , materials science , stress (linguistics) , composite number , fiber , toughness , polymerization , glass fiber , young's modulus , volume (thermodynamics) , modulus , polymer , philosophy , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics
This study examines contraction stresses of seven short fiber reinforced composites (sFRC) exhibiting different volume loads and aspect ratios (AR)* of fibres. The shift towards a greater utilization of posterior resin composites in dentistry has seen increased interest in the use of randomly oriented short glass fibers in these restorative materials. While the effect of these fibers on modulus, strength, and toughness has been studied, very little information exists on their effect on polymerization shrinkage and even less on shrinkage stress. S2‐glass fibers with an average AR of 68 were used to form three experimental groups with 5%, 10%, and 20% volume loads. Commercial sFRC with ARs of 20 and 100 were also tested. A tensilometer set up was used with moderate compliance, 5.4 J/cm 2 irradiance, and a C‐factor of 2.75. Data was statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's test. The addition of 5% of the experimental fiber did not significantly increase stress while the 10% and 20% groups resulted in 36.3% and 39.1% higher stress values, respectively, compared to the non‐fiber control group ( p < 0.05). Of all the sFRC groups, the very low AR material exhibited the lowest stress [0.682 MPa ( p = 0.001)] while another commercial material with higher AR fibers exhibited the highest overall value [1.822 MPa ( p < 0.001)] when compared to the control group. The results indicate that both short fiber volume and AR are important variables to consider with regards to setting stresses of sFRC. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 1930–1937, 2017.