z-logo
Premium
Lateral augmentation of the mandible in minipigs with a synthetic nanostructured hydroxyapatite block
Author(s) -
Kirchhoff Mark,
Lenz Solvig,
Henkel KaiOlaf,
Frerich Bernhard,
Holzhüter Gerd,
Radefeldt Sven,
Gerber Thomas
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part b: applied biomaterials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1552-4981
pISSN - 1552-4973
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.b.31775
Subject(s) - biomaterial , resorption , materials science , matrix (chemical analysis) , biomedical engineering , chemistry , dentistry , composite material , medicine , nanotechnology , pathology
The purpose of this study was to evaluate biomaterial degradation and new bone formation after implantation of a nanostructured hydroxyapatite (HA) grafting block. Furthermore, physical characteristics of the biomaterial were measured. The biomaterial consists of nanostructured HA embedded in a porous matrix of silica (SiO 2 ) gel. The blocks with two different contents of silica (group A: 24 wt % and group B: 39 wt %) were fixed with titanium screws at the lateral aspect of the mandible of minipigs ( n = 5). The specific surface areas of both blocks were measured using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation and mercury intrusion. In all animals, the wound healing was uneventful. After 5 weeks, the biomaterial percentage was 51.5% ± 12.1% for group A and 33.2% ± 5.9% for group B ( p = 0.017). New bone formation accounted to 7.6% ± 6.0% for group A and 15.3% ± 8.3% for group B ( p = 0.126) after 5 weeks. After 10 weeks, further resorption of the biomaterial led to percentages of 30.6% ± 10.0% for group A and 12.1% ± 6.7% for group B ( p = 0.000). After 10 weeks, new bone formations were measured to be 34.1% ± 10.8% in group A and 39.9% ± 13.5% in group B ( p = 0.383). The rate of degradation of the biomaterial is controlled by the composition of the material. A higher content of silica gel matrix leads to faster degradation of the biomaterial. The formation of new bone failed to show a significant difference between both groups. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2011.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom